Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Acts are functions from states of nature into finite-support distributions over a set of ‘deterministic outcomes’. We characterize preference relations over acts which have a numerical representation by the functional J(f)=min>{∫u∘ f dP¦PϵC} where f is an act, u is a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility over outcomes, and C is a closed and convex set of finitely additive probability measures on the states of nature. In addition to the usual assumptions on the preference relation as transitivity, completeness, continuity and monotonicity, we assume uncertainty aversion and certainty-independence. The last condition is a new one and is a weakening of the classical independence axiom: It requires that an act f is preferred to an act g if and only if the mixture of f and any constant act h is preferred to the same mixture of g and h. If non-degeneracy of the preference relation is also assumed, the convex set of priors C is uniquely determined. Finally, a concept of independence in case of a non-unique prior is introduced.

References (22)

  • I. Gilboa

    Expected utility theory with purely subjective non-additive probabilities

    Journal of Mathematical Economics

    (1987)
  • D. Schmeidler

    Cores of exact games, I

    Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications

    (1972)
  • C.E. Agnew

    Multiple probability assessments by dependent experts

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1985)
  • F.J. Anscombe et al.

    A definition of subjective probability

    The Annals of Mathematics and Statistics

    (1963)
  • T. Bewley

    Knightian decision theory: Part 1

    (1986)
  • G. Choquet

    Theory of capacities

    Annales de l'Institut Fourier

    (1955)
  • N. Dunford et al.

    Linear operators, Part I

    (1957)
  • D. Ellsberg

    Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms

    Quarterly Journal of Economics

    (1961)
  • P.C. Fishburn

    Utility theory for decision making

    (1970)
  • C. Genest et al.

    Modeling expert judgements for Bayesian updating

    The Annals of Statistics

    (1985)
  • P.J. Huber et al.

    Minimax tests and the neyman-Pearson lemma for capacities

    The Annals of Statistics

    (1973)
  • Cited by (2941)

    • Uncertainty and climate change: The IPCC approach vs decision theory

      2024, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
    • Ambiguous persuasion in contests

      2024, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    • Ambiguity and risk in the oil market

      2024, Economic Modelling
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors acknowledge partial financial support by the Foerder Institute for Economic Research and by The Keren Rauch Fund at Tel-Aviv University.

    View full text