Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JFDS
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR logos x
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Financial Data Science
  • IPR logos x
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Financial Data Science

The Journal of Financial Data Science

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JFDS
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

A Backtesting Protocol in the Era of Machine Learning

Rob Arnott, Campbell R. Harvey and Harry Markowitz
The Journal of Financial Data Science Winter 2019, 1 (1) 64-74; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2019.1.064
Rob Arnott
is chairman and founder of Research Affiliates, LLC, in Newport Beach, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Campbell R. Harvey
is a professor of finance at Duke University in Durham, NC, and a partner and senior advisor at Research Affiliates, LLC, in Newport Beach, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harry Markowitz
is founder of Harry Markowitz Company in San Diego, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Click to login and read the full article.

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo 
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600

Abstract

Machine learning offers a set of powerful tools that holds considerable promise for investment management. As with most quantitative applications in finance, the danger of misapplying these techniques can lead to disappointment. One crucial limitation involves data availability. Many of machine learning’s early successes originated in the physical and biological sciences, in which truly vast amounts of data are available. Machine learning applications often require far more data than are available in finance, which is of particular concern in longer-horizon investing. Hence, choosing the right applications before applying the tools is important. In addition, capital markets reflect the actions of people, who may be influenced by the actions of others and by the findings of past research. In many ways, the challenges that affect machine learning are merely a continuation of the long-standing issues researchers have always faced in quantitative finance. Although investors need to be cautious—indeed, more cautious than in past applications of quantitative methods—these new tools offer many potential applications in finance. In this article, the authors develop a research protocol that pertains both to the application of machine learning techniques and to quantitative finance in general.

TOPICS: Big data/machine learning, portfolio theory

  • © 2019 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options

US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045

UK: 0207 139 1600

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Financial Data Science: 1 (1)
The Journal of Financial Data Science
Vol. 1, Issue 1
Winter 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Financial Data Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Backtesting Protocol in the Era of Machine Learning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Financial Data Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Financial Data Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Backtesting Protocol in the Era of Machine Learning
Rob Arnott, Campbell R. Harvey, Harry Markowitz
The Journal of Financial Data Science Jan 2019, 1 (1) 64-74; DOI: 10.3905/jfds.2019.1.064

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
A Backtesting Protocol in the Era of Machine Learning
Rob Arnott, Campbell R. Harvey, Harry Markowitz
The Journal of Financial Data Science Jan 2019, 1 (1) 64-74; DOI: 10.3905/jfds.2019.1.064
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • HOW DID WE GET HERE?
    • THE WINNER’S CURSE
    • AVOIDING FALSE POSITIVES: A PROTOCOL
    • CATEGORY #1: RESEARCH MOTIVATION
    • CATEGORY #2: MULTIPLE TESTING AND STATISTICAL METHODS
    • CATEGORY #3: SAMPLE CHOICE AND DATA
    • CATEGORY #4: CROSS-VALIDATION
    • CATEGORY #5: MODEL DYNAMICS
    • CATEGORY #6: MODEL COMPLEXITY
    • CATEGORY #7: RESEARCH CULTURE
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • ENDNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • Confronting Machine Learning with Financial Research
  • The Promises and Pitfalls of Machine Learning for Predicting Stock Returns
  • How Good Is Tactical Asset Allocation Using Standard Indicators?
  • A Network and Machine Learning Approach to Factor, Asset, and Blended Allocation
  • A Holistic Approach to Financial Data Science: Data, Technology, and Analytics
  • Interactions and Interconnectedness Shape Financial Market Research
  • Beyond Carry and Momentum in Government Bonds
  • Industry Return Predictability: A Machine Learning Approach
  • Google Scholar
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
0207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10010
646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Sign In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2022 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 2640-3943 | E-ISSN: 2640-3951

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies